Employee and organizational unit adequacy calculator

Evaluating the transfer of an Employee E6888G89G (ID 3292) from Organization unit ZG0FZBP (ID 84) into the Organization unit CO8ABGZ (ID 4):

Table 1. - Evaluating adequacy of Employee E6888G89G on Organizational unit CO8ABGZ

Attribute	Employee E6888G89G	Organizational unit CO8ABGZ	Evaluation
1. IT special	goodgood	goodgood	sufficient
2. IT general	very goodvery good	very goodvery good	sufficient
3. Languages	very goodvery good	goodgood	excellent
4. Driving licence	has a driving license	not mandatory	excellent
5. Skills	excellent, according to 1, 2, 3, and 4		excellent
6. Disability (restrictions)	1person without disabilities	1no restriction	appropriate
7. Education field	Law	Law and Social	appropriate
8. Education level	7	7 - this is min.required education level for employee's work position	sufficient
9. Personal	sufficient, according to 6, 7, and 8		sufficient
10. Years of work experience	24	min.required 5 years of work experience	excellent
11. Work position	Senior expert - work position	Head of Service, Adviser, Senior expert and Correspondent	appropriate
12. Workhours	8 hours - 1 shift	8 hours - 1 shift	appropriate
13. Distance to OU*	47.04 km	should be < 100km	good
14. General	excellent, according to 10, 11, 12, and 13		excellent
15. Employee adequacy	excellent, according to 5, 9, and 14		excellent
16. Applications roles	3 appropriate	4	very good
17. Employee appropriate	excellent according to 15 and 16		excellent

According to the comparable attributes, an EMPLOYEE E6888G89G is excellent employee for Organization unit CO8ABGZ.

Table 1a. - Evaluating the transfer ability, according to "Rules for Evaluating OU transfer ability" and "Employee transfer evaluation rules"

Evaluating transfer	E6888G89G from ZG0FZBP	to CO8ABGZ	Transfer ability
OU saturation	fewer	fewer	not suggested
Number of employees	ZG0FZBP has 0 employees / 13 is optimal.	CO8ABGZ has 0 employees / 13 is optimal.
Employee to new OU	Employee evaluation is excellent, and transfer is evaluated as not suggested.		not recommended

According to the numbers of employees in both organizational units, the possibility of transfer is evaluated as not suggested. Transfer of EMPLOYEE E6888G89G is generally not recommended.