Employee and organizational unit adequacy calculator

Evaluating the transfer of an Employee E6F6AF7BF (ID 3429) from Organization unit CO2BFFZ (ID 51) into the Organization unit CO1AUBZ (ID 33):

Table 1. - Evaluating adequacy of Employee E6F6AF7BF on Organizational unit CO1AUBZ

Attribute	Employee E6F6AF7BF	Organizational unit CO1AUBZ	Evaluation
1. IT special	very goodvery good	very goodvery good	sufficient
2. IT general	very goodvery good	very goodvery good	sufficient
3. Languages	very goodvery good	very goodvery good	sufficient
4. Driving licence	has a driving license	not mandatory	excellent
5. Skills	sufficient, according to 1, 2, 3, and 4		sufficient
6. Disability (restrictions)	1person without disabilities	1no restriction	appropriate
7. Education field	Social	Economy, Law and Social	appropriate
8. Education level	7	7 - this is min.required education level for employee's work position	sufficient
9. Personal	sufficient, according to 6, 7, and 8		sufficient
10. Years of work experience	21	min.required 5 years of work experience	excellent
11. Work position	Head of Service - work position	Head of Service, Adviser, Senior expert and Correspondent	appropriate
12. Workhours	8 hours - 1 shift	8 hours - 1 shift	appropriate
13. Distance to OU*	5.61 km	should be < 100km	preferred
14. General	excellent, according to 10, 11, 12, and 13		excellent
15. Employee adequacy	adequate, according to 5, 9, and 14		adequate
16. Applications roles	2 appropriate	5	acceptable
17. Employee appropriate	appropriate according to 15 and 16		appropriate

According to the comparable attributes, an EMPLOYEE E6F6AF7BF is appropriate employee for Organization unit CO1AUBZ.

Table 1a. - Evaluating the transfer ability, according to "Rules for Evaluating OU transfer ability" and "Employee transfer evaluation rules"

Evaluating transfer	E6F6AF7BF from CO2BFFZ	to CO1AUBZ	Transfer ability
OU saturation	fewer	fewer	not suggested
Number of employees	CO2BFFZ has 0 employees / 13 is optimal.	CO1AUBZ has 0 employees / 13 is optimal.
Employee to new OU	Employee evaluation is appropriate, and transfer is evaluated as not suggested.		not recommended

According to the numbers of employees in both organizational units, the possibility of transfer is evaluated as not suggested. Transfer of EMPLOYEE E6F6AF7BF is generally not recommended.